A mod poll
May. 15th, 2006 07:45 pmOkay... There are apparently rumours circulating about some crusade against non-friends locked communities involving slash fiction and Viggo. Too many folk with too much time on their hands, I say... But I've been alerted to some concerns that
rugbytackle might be targetted and that LJ might be forced to close it. I have no idea if any of this is true - or if locking the community (if indeed that is possible with 400+ existing members) will prevent anything that might happen from happening... But,
[Poll #729378]
Please add any further comments you might have in a reply to this post. I'd be very grateful!
Thanks,
Heath
[Poll #729378]
Please add any further comments you might have in a reply to this post. I'd be very grateful!
Thanks,
Heath
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:23 pm (UTC)I'm new to this (apologies if there are any stupid questions in what follows) and am presuming that members-locked communities would require a reader to join LJ before accessing the materials, in which case it would become rather like the old gambling laws in the UK where folk had to 'join' a club before being able to gamble. This is putting another step infront of the potential reader and if someone didn't want to join LJ it would be a block. Do we know how many readers there are for Rugbytackling right now who aren't 'members'? Also if the community was members only, which would presumably block casual discovery readers, who fall into the site without necessarily knowing of its existence beforehand, would there still be ways of providing non-blocked signposts?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:31 pm (UTC)You already have: This community features Real-Person Slash (RPS). If you don't know what that is, we recommend reading AlterNet's story about it before you proceed any further. By reading or participating, you agree not to threaten or harass any members of the community. So you should be able to add in something about how 'by requesting membership, you accept that this is a slash community for the express purpose of sharing fictional works and is in no way real or implying that any characters, fictional or living, are in any way construed to have any characteristics or sexual preferences as alluded to, implied, or downright screamed out loud herein.'
Something like that, anyway. ^_^ Best of luck with it. :) I don't have any VigBeans to add to the gloriousness yet, but am working on writing some real slash, so who knows.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:35 pm (UTC)It's not Viggo raising the fuss.
Some French floozy's got her knickers in a twist over evil people like us saying Untrue Things about Viggo (who she apparently deems too weak and defenseless to handle such things), such as insinuating that Viggo might be open enough and human enough to snog a mate, and she's ranting that we're corrupting innocent children who stumble across us accidentally (hello, I stumbled across extremerestraints.com accidentally, and she's worried about US??) and she's attempting to raise a stink.
I don't know how far she can get. She's an idiot, and probably boring at parties.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:35 pm (UTC)The issue of preventing children from access is a tougher one. I'm a parent and I monitor what my kids do on line, for a mutlitude of reasons, but obviously some people won't.
It is far too easy to lie about you age when you are on line and I don't know that locking the community would solve the problem.
My suggestion is that you have a formula disclaimer that every poster must use, similar to what's on rugbytackling.com, subject to their post being removed for failure to comply. We should also probably have a different one for FPS, to avoid copyright problems. (Which those laws are far more strict in the US than the libel laws are).
We can't police the internet on behalf of parents . . .
I found LJ through rugbytackle, and it's been so much more for me than just a place to read Viggo/Sean smut. I would hate to deny anyone else the opportunity by locking the comm.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:43 pm (UTC)http://loeil-et-la-main.cultureforum.net/viewtopic.forum?p=1400#1400
(thanks to
The witch-hunt *preens* starts apparently from Viggo fans.
I am not sure how LJ would respond, but based on the terms of service (and if you read them carefully they basically state that they are not in any way responsible for journals contents) they will not delete a journal but - quote -
Should any Content that you have authored be reported to LiveJournal as being offensive or inappropriate, LiveJournal might call upon you to retract, modify, or protect (by means of private and friends only settings) the Content in question within a reasonable amount of time, as determined by the LiveJournal staff. Should you fail to meet such a request from LiveJournal staff, LiveJournal may terminate your account. LiveJournal, however, is under no obligation to restrict or monitor journal Content in any way;
As I see it, we can wait and see ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:58 pm (UTC)Actually the whole thing along with some arguments is in
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:47 pm (UTC)She joined lots of communities, clearly without reading about the content and was then appalled by what we wrote. She then contacted PP and tried to get them all in a twist about RPS, which didn't happen and now she's cross with everyone...
At the height of this trouble I thought about making
I'm sure LJ will kindly ask us to close it before they delete it....
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 08:14 pm (UTC)Sorry, but this is such a peeve of mine. Slash has been going on for over 30 years now. The entertainment industry? KNOWS.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:48 pm (UTC)Looking at the two relevant FAQ Questions, 107 (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=107) and 112 (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=112) the comm might be considered a grey area. The thing to remember here is that even hard core visual porn, provided everyone is of age--not a problem with the pairing on this comm--is considered to have artistic or literary value and doesn't meet the legal definition of "indecent" as determined by the Miller Test (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test). Text porn is even less likely to get the boot because it's almost impossible to prove that it doesn't have some literary value, and no one wants to spend the time and money arguing over the literary value of legal porn written by people who aren't making a profit.
Having said all that, be aware that a) I am not a lawyer, and b) LJ Abuse has been known to take the easiest route with complaints instead of the right one. I don't know who you would write to, possibly the Abuse Team, but if you do have doubts it might be a good idea to ask for an official opinion.
Technically, I don't think we're doing anything wrong; which is why I leave my smut unlocked on my LJ. I also think that flocking things is an absurd, cosmetic detail which does nothing at all to keep minors from reading anything they want. But that's me.
I will suggest that anyone who archives their fic only on LJ might want to back it all up, but you do that anyway. Right?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 07:58 pm (UTC)Chiming in to agree with you here. I'm relatively against flocking whole comms, and generally decline from posting anything in them (for various reasons). This fear of being punished whips through the fanfiction community, what, every couple months? I have as of yet to see it come to much. This latest round sounds like a nuisance but ultimately a tempest in a teapot.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 08:04 pm (UTC)I say relax and keep things business as usual - these things usually blow over as fast as they come up.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 08:07 pm (UTC)Past experience about LJ Abuse's responses to even minor complaints is delete now, answer questions later as it's easier on them than investigating things. If you are seriously worried that the mindless bint who is on this 'crusade' on behalf of Viggo will specify this journal then I'd lock it at least until the 'threat' clears.
However, I kind of think that Viggo himself won't mind. He's an artist and a creator. He appreciates creativity and what are we doing here if not creating. Or maybe I'm in cloud cuckoo land. :(
I'm sorry you are having to put up with this tripe. It just makes me tear my hair out at the reasoning behind the people doing this. Just what do they gain out of it? Why do they think it's their bloody job to save Viggo? The mind boggles. :(
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 08:22 pm (UTC)LJ FAQ 196 (http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=196) goes into rules for adult communities, though it's vague on the definition. I've never sat down and counted the romance-to-porn ratio on Rugbytackle, but there are G and PG stories on here. Worst-case scenario, Rugbytackle goes adult, and R/NC-17 fics are members-locked. I'd hate to see it happen, but it's better than deletion.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 09:39 pm (UTC)And may I say, that I'm sick and tired of people who feel the need to bitch about slash, when all they needed to do is to just ignore it and let it "live in peace", so to say? Nobody is FORCED to read slash, right? And I think the "warning" in the community profile is a pretty good hint of what to expect in this particular community.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-15 10:50 pm (UTC)Same for the RT archive site -- periodically I get the "OMGZ WHY WON'T YOU THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" and "EWWWW, SICK, I'M GONNA COMPLAIN AND GET YOU SHUT DOWN!" emails. Unless such emails come directly from Viggo or Sean's lawyers (which so far hasn't happened) then they go straight to the trash bin.
I do understand that some people find slash "insulting" or objectionable or whatever, and that's cool. Different strokes for different folks. But it's not my job to filter the Internet for them.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 03:10 am (UTC)You ladies (and men?) keep doing what you’re doing. Your work is always entertaining and I love you all for brilliant writing! If you decide to friends-lock, just don't leave me behind. *makes puppy-dog eyes at the screen* Yeah, I know it's pathetic, but it's the best I can do! LOL
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 03:38 am (UTC)Perhaps we can check with LJ authorities to see under what circumstances would they shut a comm down?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 06:20 am (UTC)I don't know why people get so uptight about all this. Sex is a normal part of life and if your kids by some perchance stumble across a bit of 'slash' it's hardly going to be the undoing of them.
As for Viggo and Sean, I doubt very much that they are going to care a rats arse about a mob of middle aged lunatic women writing homoerotic stories about them. They will probably take it as a compliment.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 07:25 am (UTC)The downside of locking comms is that "genuine" fans may miss out if they arrive on the scene late. I don't understand why people are so concerned that their children might stumble across something shocking - if one spends time with them and is aware of their interests, I think it is unlikely (and there will be an opportunity to explain the reasons behind the rules you set. Parenting should be done by us (the parents) not the entire world.
Sorry, I'll shut up now :)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 07:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 07:52 am (UTC)I think there comes a point where locking slash becomes necessary to protect everyone involved - but I also think that maybe this could be solved by a (maybe intermediate) step of asking writers to use their discretion as to locking explicit slash.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 10:17 am (UTC)I am European, but I definitely don't share the feelings of this French - I wannabe Viggo's keeper - girl. I honestly think Viggo would laugh about the whole thing and Sean would probably shrug it off. I say let's keep it open and see what happens.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 12:19 pm (UTC)I belong to
RT is like that in that it is already popular, and if anything you'll see an increase in members from the delurkers.
Good luck Heath. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 02:46 pm (UTC)But this Frenchwoman's crusade just makes me sick to death. Yes, I have my fantasies about this guy as well, but I would never ever dream of acting like I am my star's bloody (excuse the language!) guardian!!
I have had enough of these dumb fans who cannot differentiate between fannishness and entitlement.
If you feel the need, Flock the comm, I will still be here after the storm *hugs*
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 04:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 01:51 am (UTC)I can't get over someone stirring the pot (so to speak) and getting everyone up in arms over something they don't like.
I posted this in my own LJ, figured ya'll would get a kick out of it as well :-)
Whatever ya'll decide will be fine with me.